Standards of the Selection.

Each product in the Aritelon Workshop catalogue passes through a documented selection process. This page describes that process in full: from initial supplier identification through to editorial listing and seasonal review.

Selection team member reviewing ingredient documentation papers on a white table with botanical raw material samples in small labelled glass jars arranged in a grid beside the documents
Ingredient review session — Aritelon Workshop, 2026

The Foundation

Aritelon Workshop selects products under the following principles: each item in the catalogue is reviewed for ingredient transparency before listing, supplier documentation is requested where available, corrections are noted in the catalogue record, and the selection team discloses any commercial relationships that could influence inclusion.

This framework applies equally to body care and supplement listings. No category receives preferential processing. The three-stage review is completed for every candidate before a listing is created.

What We Assess

Products in the Aritelon Workshop catalogue are selected based on published ingredient research and reviewed for sourcing transparency before listing. The team assesses each candidate against five criteria: ingredient list legibility, origin documentation, formulation consistency, supplier response to enquiries, and editorial fit with the daily wellness remit.

Items that do not meet the minimum documentation standard are held in a review queue rather than declined outright. Suppliers are given the opportunity to provide additional information before a final listing decision is made.

Five Stages from Identification to Listing

01

Initial Identification

Candidate products are identified through field observation, industry publications, peer referral networks, and the team's own market surveys. At this stage, no formal documentation is requested. The team records the candidate name, supplier, and a brief rationale for consideration.

02

Supplier Documentation Request

A formal request is sent to the supplier for ingredient documentation, origin records, and any third-party assessments available. The team records the date of request and the nature of the response. Non-response within 30 days places the candidate in the pending queue.

03

Ingredient Transparency Assessment

The ingredient list is reviewed against the workshop's transparency checklist. This covers: full INCI or nutritional panel disclosure, plant-derived component identification, concentration information where available, and absence of undisclosed proprietary blends. Items that pass receive an assessment note in the internal record.

04

Editorial Cross-Reference

Key botanical or nutritional ingredients are cross-referenced against published literature. For body care, this covers known skin nourishment properties and documented use in daily body care routines. For supplements, this covers nutritional reference values and general wellness applications. The team notes the published sources consulted.

05

Catalogue Entry Creation

Upon passing stages one through four, a catalogue entry is created. The entry records product name, supplier origin, key botanicals or nutrients, format, and a brief editorial observation. The entry date is logged. Each item is subject to review at the next seasonal update cycle.

What Transparency Means in Practice

Body Creams

Botanical Sourcing

For body cream and lotion listings, the team prioritises items that disclose the botanical origin of key emollients and active plant extracts. Cold-pressed oils, shea butter, and plant-derived emulsifiers are assessed for traceable origin where documentation is available.

  • INCI list completeness
  • Plant-derived component identification
  • Cold-press and extraction method notes
Vitamins & Supplements

Nutritional Disclosure

Supplement listings are assessed for nutritional panel completeness. The team notes whether a product discloses per-serving quantities for each listed nutrient, reference intake percentages, and the form of each vitamin or mineral used (e.g., vitamin D3 vs. D2, magnesium citrate vs. oxide).

  • Per-serving nutrient quantities
  • Reference intake percentage disclosure
  • Nutrient form identification
Ongoing Review

Seasonal Corrections

Catalogue entries are reviewed four times annually. At each review, the team checks whether formulation details have changed, whether supplier documentation remains current, and whether any editorial notes require updating. Entries with material changes are flagged and revised.

  • Quarterly review cycle
  • Formulation change tracking
  • Entry removal for discontinued items

Where Ingredients Originate

The current catalogue covers products with documented ingredient origins across twelve regions. Body care botanicals draw primarily from West African shea-producing regions, Moroccan argan cultivation areas, Mediterranean cold-press olive sources, and Northern European herbal cultivation zones.

Supplement ingredient origins documented in the current edition include European mineral extraction sites, Scandinavian omega-3 sourcing operations, and B-vitamin production facilities with published third-party documentation.

The team notes that origin documentation is not available for all ingredients in all entries. Where origin is undisclosed by the supplier, this is noted explicitly in the catalogue record rather than omitted or estimated.

West Africa
Shea & botanical oils
Morocco
Argan & rose extracts
Scandinavia
Omega-3 & vitamin D
Mediterranean
Olive & herbal infusions

Methodology Questions

Products with incomplete documentation are placed in the review queue rather than declined outright. The team contacts the supplier with a specific documentation request. If complete information is provided within 30 days, the review resumes. If not, the item remains in the queue until the next seasonal cycle.
The workshop is a documentation catalogue, not a testing facility. Independent assessments are not conducted in-house. Where a supplier has commissioned third-party reviews and makes the documentation available, these are reviewed and referenced. The team does not commission new independent assessments.
At each seasonal review, the team checks for formulation changes across all active listings. When a change is identified — whether through supplier notification or direct comparison — the entry is updated to reflect the current formulation. Material changes that affect the basis for listing may result in a re-review.
Listings are not available by application. The team identifies candidates through its own observation and research process. Suppliers may contact the team to provide documentation for products already in the review queue, but submitting a product for consideration is not possible through a formal application channel.

Products listed in the Aritelon Workshop catalogue are presented for informational purposes and reflect the selection team's observations on everyday body care and wellness supplement routines. The catalogue is not intended as professional advice, nor as guidance for the management of any specific condition. Individuals with specific requirements are encouraged to speak with a qualified wellness professional before introducing any new routine.